Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Homophonic Typos

In the ever-entertaining world of typos, I think my favorite are homophonic typos -- substitutions of words or phrases that sound similar, but are spelled differently (e.g., "reign in" instead of "rein in"). Whether through ignorance or subconscious morphing, the printed result is often pretty funny (the tired exceptions being "there, their, they're" and "your, you're").

Here are a few I've collected from my reading over the past few weeks:
  • a rye comment
  • why should people before to fund something they are opposed to
  • [name] and [name] when to school together
  • if he thinks that, he's a full
  • interest rates paid on funds buy investment firms

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Street Name Generator

One of the first things I noticed about this area is that nearly all street names have 2 words plus the type of street (e.g., "Eagle Springs Parkway"). It's not like that in the older areas closer to downtown, just in the newer suburbs, so I have to assume it's simply to sound pretentious. Our neighborhood, bless its clubhouse, has some of the dumbest, most generic nature names you can imagine. I took the best and put the first, second and third parts in separate lists to create the Eagle Springs Street Name Generator:



Master of the Universe

No, I'm not quite He-Man (although his title would be a cool nickname for graduate students in astronomy), but as I posted over on BrownBytes, I'm completely done with my Master's degree. It is with a tiny bit of sadness and a lot of relief that I leave school behind permanently for the first time in 23 years.

I'm still in that mild shock that comes from major life changes. It's like coming back from a mission -- you know you aren't going back, but it's still so fresh in your mind it's hard to believe it's really over. I still feel like I should have some research or writing to do. Probably because I've had that feeling nagging at me for years. Mostly I'm just relieved that my defense went smoothly, I didn't have to do more work or make changes, and I don't have to worry about my salary getting docked or losing my job because I never got the degree I said I was going to.

I'm looking forward to doing things I'm interested in without having to worry about any upcoming deadlines. Even when there was nothing practical for me to do except wait, it was hard for me to justify other projects. I don't even really have any hobbies, and I think I'd like to. Any suggestions?

The trip itself to Utah was quite fun and it was nice to see everyone in Provo again. I miss it a little, but I'm glad to be gone. It's still too much of a college town to me. I couldn't feel like I'd completely grown up until I got out of there. I'm very happy with my current situation.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Commercials 2.0

I was reading an article about how Google was trying to figure out how to make money off of its acquisition of YouTube through advertising and it made me sad. Video advertising grates on me. I can't stand the volume and harshness and ridiculous length of television commercials, and even the short clips before many online videos quickly become irritating. I would hate to think that Google, of "don't be evil" fame wouldn't know better than this. It's the reason they stuck to textual ads instead of flashy banner ads and pop-ups.

YouTube is the epitome of Web 2.0 -- a website of user-created content. If you want to advertise, why not keep that philosophy in its advertising? Let the users create the ads! Give them the motivation (cash kickbacks for popular videos), the subject and guidelines (determined by sponsor), and let the masses have at it. Since the meme fad started, advertisers have been futilely trying to create the viral success of a Numa Numa Kid or Don't Tase Me Bro! from the top down, when they should be trying from the bottom up. Ordinary people have the means, ability, talent, and most importantly free time to make hilarious videos. Harness that talent, essentially for free, to create a mass of commercials which will sort themselves in popularity. Gems will rise from dross, whether good for intentional reasons or not, and people will see advertisements they relate to and actually enjoy. If popular enough, they could become ad campaigns, even extending to other media.

Will it ever happen? I don't know, but if it does, remember, you heard it here first!

Wednesday, June 04, 2008

Yes, Beaker?

We had our weekly group meeting this morning. It's a fine way to spend a couple hours, but as I've mentioned previously, meetings tend to cause my mind to wander and try to amuse itself. Each group meeting we go around the conference table and every group member gives a short summary on the progress of his or her work. This is normally uneventful, but I can't help but smile when it gets to David. He is a native of some Asian country and has a very thick accent; thick enough that if you put your ears "out of focus" a little, for a few seconds at a time you can hear just the sounds he is making without understanding the words. As he responds to the follow-up questions posed by our supervisor, a native Texan with a moderate drawl, it conjures up in my head humorous images of some kind of Han Solo-Chewbacca or Strong Bad-The Cheat relationship -- one mumbling nonsense and the other understanding perfectly and responding in English. Then I imagine I'm part of a dramatic, intergalactic rebellion, fighting for the forces of good. Well, maybe not that last part, but I do chuckle a little to myself.

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

Visitor

Monday, June 02, 2008

It's not my responsibility

FEMA recently announced that they are closing all the FEMA trailers used by victims of hurricane Katrina. They are taking away these emergency, temporary trailers after 3 years. And of course, FEMA is the bad guy because these people have no place to go.

You could see it coming, but it still annoys me. Put unaspiring people into free trailer homes, and they'll take the easiest course -- stay until kicked out. Granted, many didn't get the trailers until up to a year after the storm, but you can get an associates degree in 2 years. I can't believe that these people, barring the elderly and disabled, couldn't have improved their situation, through hard work, enough to move out, regardless of intelligence, race, or previous condition. This quotation sums up the problem:
I didn't ask to be in this situation. I'm a citizen. I'm a native of this city. And it's part of their responsibility to take care of us as taxpayers. And they're not doing that.
Ultimately, of course, it is an individual's responsibility to take care of himself and people would be better off for realizing this. We can look to others for help, but in the end it's up to us. As government has continued to bloat and expand its role, we pay more and more in taxes and understandably expect something in return. The Founding Fathers did a remarkable job constructing a government that protects against consolidated power, but unfortunately did not plan a way to limit the overall size and power of government. The more we pay in taxes, the more we expect, and the more we expect, the more we have to pay, both literally and figuratively, to actually get it.

It's a vicious cycle and it's transferring individual responsibility to the collective. We all pay into the same big pot and everybody gets treated fairly. Fair has been tried before in many socialist forms. It doesn't work. It saps the energy out of a people by giving them nothing to strive for, and it produces mediocre goods and inefficient services. Ironically, it becomes unfair to those who could have achieved more.

We have strayed so far from our original, limited government that it's almost unrecognizable. I understand the desire to help those that can't or won't help themselves, but doles only create dependence. If the government wants to save us from ourselves, require us to pay into a health or retirement plan, like we're required to have auto insurance. Take it out of our paychecks like Social Security if you have to, but let the individual pay for himself and choose where the money goes. The government could even sponsor one of these plans, although chances are slim it could compete against free-market competition.

This is unfair to the poor people, you say, who will get shoddy treatment for their meager contributions. In answer to this, yes, it is. And life will always be unfair to everyone in different ways, but forcing fairness only creates animosity. If people are forced to take responsibility for themselves and choose their own services, the free market will provide much more efficient, higher-quality, low-cost services than the government ever could. And if the money we are wasting now on government services were used in an incentive-based way to allow people to improve themselves, they could fish for themselves instead of eating for a day. Give people incentive to improve and they will improve. Give them a way to be lazy, and they will be lazy.

It's sad to see that the conservative movement has lost sight of this and that the voters have accepted it. Our choices are Democrats with big government and liberal ideals, Libertarians with small government and liberal ideals, and Republicans, who have kept their conservative ideals but become big government. Somebody, whether a reprioritized Republican party or someone new, needs to turn on the light bulb for the American people. Instill in them a sense of pride for running their own life instead of submitting to government ineptitude. Give them back their tax dollars to use as they decide. Show them that their life is their responsibility, and that they could actually do really well for themselves if they put in a little effort and limited the government to regulating instead of implementing.

I doubt it will happen -- once you've given the lollipop, it's hard to take it away -- but I can always hope.